Learn how Baserow and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Baserow appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in growth, activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Baserow having 5,637 stars and Rowy having 6,833 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Baserow has 690 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Baserow is growing faster, adding 259 stars in the last 30 days (+4.8%) against adding 9 stars for Rowy (+0.1%). Baserow is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Baserow shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 hours ago, while Rowy was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Baserow is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Baserow uses Bash, Python, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js, Django while Rowy leverages CSS, JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Baserow beginning 6 years ago and Rowy 7 years ago.
Baserow uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Rowy's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Baserow also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Relational Databases (SQL) while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Baserow provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.