Learn how Baserow and NocoDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

NocoDB appears to have several advantages over Baserow, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoDB significantly outpaces Baserow in community adoption with 62,875 stars compared to 4,745 stars on GitHub. This 13.3x difference suggests NocoDB has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoDB has 4,749 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Baserow last updated 3 hours ago and NocoDB 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Baserow uses Python, Django while NocoDB leverages CSS, JSX, NestJS.
NocoDB has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Baserow which began 6 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests NocoDB may have more mature features and established processes.
NocoDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Baserow's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Baserow also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Relational Databases (SQL) while NocoDB extends into Database Tools & GUIs.
Both Baserow and NocoDB offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.