Learn how NocoDB and Teable differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

NocoDB appears to have several advantages over Teable, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoDB leads in popularity with 64,902 stars vs 21,758 stars for Teable. The 198% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, NocoDB has 5,040 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoDB and Teable are moving at much the same rate, adding 429 stars and adding 117 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoDB last updated 13 hours ago and Teable 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, NestJS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: NocoDB uses SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js while Teable leverages Next.js.
NocoDB has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Teable which began 4 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests NocoDB may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoDB also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs while Teable extends into Collaborative Workspaces.
Both NocoDB and Teable offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.