Learn how Busabase and Teable differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Teable appears to have several advantages over Busabase, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Teable significantly outpaces Busabase in community adoption with 21,811 stars compared to 219 stars on GitHub. This 99.6x difference suggests Teable has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Teable has 1,346 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Teable is growing faster, adding 129 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 0 stars for Busabase (0%). Teable is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Busabase last updated 3 days ago and Teable 12 hours ago.
Teable has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Busabase which began 3 months ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Teable may have more mature features and established processes.
Busabase uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Teable's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: Teable extends into Low-Code/No-Code.
Both Busabase and Teable offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.