Learn how Budibase and NocoDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v3.50.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
budibase/budibase
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
2026.10.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
nocodb/nocodb
NocoDB appears to have several advantages over Budibase, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoDB leads in popularity with 65,408 stars vs 28,376 stars for Budibase. The 131% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, NocoDB has 5,131 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Budibase and NocoDB are moving at much the same rate, adding 44 stars and adding 238 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Budibase last updated 12 hours ago and NocoDB 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Nuxt.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Budibase uses Next.js while NocoDB leverages SCSS, Vue, NestJS.
NocoDB has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Budibase which began 7 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests NocoDB may have more mature features and established processes.
NocoDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Budibase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoDB extends into Database Tools & GUIs.
Both Budibase and NocoDB offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.