Learn how AppSmith and Budibase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both AppSmith and Budibase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with AppSmith having 40,838 stars and Budibase having 28,264 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, AppSmith has 4,757 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
AppSmith is growing faster, adding 227 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 72 stars for Budibase (+0.3%). AppSmith is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppSmith last updated 13 hours ago and Budibase 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppSmith uses Python, Java while Budibase leverages Next.js, Nuxt.js.
Budibase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to AppSmith which began 6 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Budibase may have more mature features and established processes.
AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Budibase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code.
Both AppSmith and Budibase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.