Learn how AppSmith and Budibase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both AppSmith and Budibase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with AppSmith having 39,698 stars and Budibase having 27,875 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, AppSmith has 4,547 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppSmith last updated 6 hours ago and Budibase 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppSmith uses Python, Java while Budibase leverages Next.js, Nuxt.js.
Budibase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to AppSmith which began 6 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Budibase may have more mature features and established processes.
AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Budibase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code.
Both AppSmith and Budibase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.