Learn how NocoDB and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

NocoDB appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoDB significantly outpaces Rowy in community adoption with 62,867 stars compared to 6,805 stars on GitHub. This 9.2x difference suggests NocoDB has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoDB has 4,748 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoDB shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 hours ago, while Rowy was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests NocoDB is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: NocoDB uses Bash, SCSS, Vue, NestJS, Nuxt.js.
NocoDB has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Rowy which began 7 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests NocoDB may have more mature features and established processes.
NocoDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Rowy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoDB also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
NocoDB provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.