Learn how AITable and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 6 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

AITable appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
AITable leads in popularity with 15,316 stars vs 6,804 stars for Rowy. The 125% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, AITable has 1,395 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
AITable shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 months ago, while Rowy was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests AITable is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AITable uses Bash, Next.js, Java, NestJS, Lua.
Rowy has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to AITable which began 4 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Rowy may have more mature features and established processes.
AITable is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Rowy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: AITable also focuses on Workflow Automation, NoSQL & Document Databases while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).