Learn how NocoDB and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both NocoDB and ToolJet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoDB leads in popularity with 64,595 stars vs 40,529 stars for ToolJet. The 59% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,365 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ToolJet is growing faster, adding 2,287 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 410 stars for NocoDB (+0.6%). ToolJet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoDB last updated 12 hours ago and ToolJet 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, NestJS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: NocoDB uses Vue, Nuxt.js while ToolJet leverages Perl.
NocoDB has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to ToolJet which began 5 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests NocoDB may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoDB also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs.
Both NocoDB and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.