Ad
 
Learn more

Palmr vs Seafile

Learn how Palmr and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Palmr

Palmr

Self-hosted file sharing platform with encryption, S3 storage, REST API, and lightning-fast uploads. Deploy in minutes with full data control.
  • Stars


    2,420
  • Forks


    96
  • Last commit


    2 months ago
  • Repository age


    1 year
  • License


    Apache-2.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Warning: This repository was archived by the owner. It might not be actively maintained anymore.

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Palmr
Favicon of Seafile

Seafile

Open source file sync and sharing platform with custom properties, AI automation, collaborative editing, and enterprise-grade security for teams.
  • Stars


    14,608
  • Forks


    1,638
  • Last commit


    5 days ago
  • Repository age


    14 years
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Seafile

Detailed Comparison

Both Palmr and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Seafile wins
Community & Popularity

Seafile significantly outpaces Palmr in community adoption with 14,608 stars compared to 2,420 stars on GitHub. This 6.0x difference suggests Seafile has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,638 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Seafile wins
Development Activity

Seafile shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while Palmr was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Seafile is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Palmr uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Seafile leverages C, Objective-C, C++.

Seafile wins
Project Maturity

Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Palmr which began 1 year ago. This 12.8-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.

Palmr wins
Licensing

Palmr is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.

Palmr wins
Hosting & Deployment

Palmr provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Seafile may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.