Learn how Nextcloud and Palmr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This repository was archived by the owner. It might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Nextcloud appears to have several advantages over Palmr, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Nextcloud significantly outpaces Palmr in community adoption with 34,675 stars compared to 2,420 stars on GitHub. This 14.3x difference suggests Nextcloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 4,833 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Nextcloud shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 hours ago, while Palmr was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Nextcloud is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nextcloud uses SCSS, PHP, Vue while Palmr leverages JSX, Python, Next.js.
Nextcloud has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Palmr which began 1 year ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Nextcloud may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Nextcloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Palmr uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Nextcloud also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Storage.
Both Nextcloud and Palmr offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.