Learn how OpenCloud and Palmr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This repository was archived by the owner. It might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Both OpenCloud and Palmr have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCloud leads in popularity with 5,246 stars vs 2,420 stars for Palmr. The 117% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCloud has 178 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenCloud shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Palmr was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OpenCloud is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses Golang, PHP while Palmr leverages Python, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenCloud beginning 1 year ago and Palmr 1 year ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share.
Palmr provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenCloud may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs