Learn how Cozy and Palmr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This repository was archived by the owner. It might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Both Cozy and Palmr have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Palmr leads in popularity with 2,420 stars vs 1,263 stars for Cozy. The 92% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cozy has 142 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cozy shows more recent development activity with its last commit 17 hours ago, while Palmr was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Cozy is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cozy uses Golang while Palmr leverages Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js.
Cozy has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Palmr which began 1 year ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Cozy may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Cozy is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Palmr uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cozy also focuses on Cloud Storage, Security & Privacy.
Both Cozy and Palmr offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.