Learn how Filestash and Nextcloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these storage tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Filestash and Nextcloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Nextcloud leads in popularity with 36,794 stars vs 14,659 stars for Filestash. The 151% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 5,181 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Filestash is growing faster, adding 191 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 372 stars for Nextcloud (+1%). Filestash is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Filestash last updated 4 days ago and Nextcloud 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Filestash uses Golang, C, Objective-C while Nextcloud leverages Typescript, Vue, PHP.
Nextcloud has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Filestash which began 9 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests Nextcloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Filestash also focuses on File Management while Nextcloud extends into Cloud File Sync & Share, Collaborative Workspaces.
Both Filestash and Nextcloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.