Learn how Filestash and Nextcloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these storage tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Nextcloud appears to have several advantages over Filestash, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Nextcloud leads in popularity with 36,558 stars vs 14,537 stars for Filestash. The 151% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 5,133 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Filestash and Nextcloud are moving at much the same rate, adding 120 stars and adding 305 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Filestash last updated 3 days ago and Nextcloud 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Filestash uses Golang, C, Objective-C while Nextcloud leverages Typescript, Vue, PHP.
Nextcloud has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Filestash which began 9 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests Nextcloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Filestash also focuses on File Management while Nextcloud extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Cloud File Sync & Share.
Both Filestash and Nextcloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.