Learn how Focalboard and Windshift differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

Both Focalboard and Windshift have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Focalboard significantly outpaces Windshift in community adoption with 26,223 stars compared to 22 stars on GitHub. This 1192.0x difference suggests Focalboard has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,545 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Focalboard last updated 24 days ago and Windshift 11 hours ago.
Focalboard has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Windshift which began 6 months ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests Focalboard may have more mature features and established processes.
Windshift is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management.
Both Focalboard and Windshift offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs