Learn how Strapi and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Strapi appears to have several advantages over Webiny, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Strapi significantly outpaces Webiny in community adoption with 72,971 stars compared to 8,032 stars on GitHub. This 9.1x difference suggests Strapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Strapi has 9,844 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Strapi and Webiny are moving at much the same rate, adding 272 stars and adding 15 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Strapi last updated 22 hours ago and Webiny 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Strapi uses Bash while Webiny leverages CSS, SCSS.
Strapi has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Webiny which began 9 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Strapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Webiny extends into Web Frameworks.
Both Strapi and Webiny offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.