Ad
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.Learn More
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.Learn how Strapi and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Strapi appears to have several advantages over Webiny, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Strapi significantly outpaces Webiny in community adoption with 72,749 stars compared to 8,021 stars on GitHub. This 9.1x difference suggests Strapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Strapi has 9,811 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Strapi last updated 16 hours ago and Webiny 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Strapi uses Bash while Webiny leverages CSS, SCSS.
Strapi has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Webiny which began 9 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Strapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Webiny extends into Web Frameworks.
Both Strapi and Webiny offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Strapivs
TinaCMSActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
