Learn how Payload and Strapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Payload and Strapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Strapi leads in popularity with 71,907 stars vs 41,863 stars for Payload. The 72% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Strapi has 9,655 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Payload last updated 14 hours ago and Strapi 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Payload uses CSS, Next.js, SCSS, Remix.
Strapi has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Payload which began 5 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests Strapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Payload is licensed under MIT, while Strapi's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Payload and Strapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.