Learn how Payload and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Both Payload and Webiny have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Payload significantly outpaces Webiny in community adoption with 43,111 stars compared to 7,991 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests Payload has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Payload has 3,821 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Payload last updated 16 hours ago and Webiny 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Payload uses Bash, Next.js, Remix.
Webiny has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Payload which began 5 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Webiny may have more mature features and established processes.
Payload is licensed under MIT, while Webiny's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Webiny extends into Web Frameworks.
Both Payload and Webiny offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.