Learn how Payload and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Payload and Webiny have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Payload significantly outpaces Webiny in community adoption with 44,267 stars compared to 8,031 stars on GitHub. This 5.5x difference suggests Payload has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Payload has 4,066 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Payload is growing faster, adding 560 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 16 stars for Webiny (+0.2%). Payload is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Payload last updated 9 hours ago and Webiny 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Payload uses Bash, Next.js, Remix.
Webiny has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Payload which began 6 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Webiny may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Webiny extends into Web Frameworks.
Both Payload and Webiny offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.