Learn how TinaCMS and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both TinaCMS and Webiny have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
TinaCMS leads in popularity with 13,736 stars vs 8,031 stars for Webiny. The 71% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, TinaCMS has 741 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
TinaCMS is growing faster, adding 68 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 16 stars for Webiny (+0.2%). TinaCMS is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with TinaCMS last updated 19 hours ago and Webiny 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TinaCMS uses Bash, Next.js, Golang while Webiny leverages SCSS.
Webiny has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to TinaCMS which began 7 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Webiny may have more mature features and established processes.
Webiny uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TinaCMS's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Webiny extends into Web Frameworks.
Webiny provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while TinaCMS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.