Learn how ProcessWire and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web frameworks is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Webiny appears to have several advantages over ProcessWire, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Webiny significantly outpaces ProcessWire in community adoption with 8,031 stars compared to 1,145 stars on GitHub. This 7.0x difference suggests Webiny has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Webiny has 673 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ProcessWire and Webiny are moving at much the same rate, adding 5 stars and adding 16 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with ProcessWire last updated 5 days ago and Webiny 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ProcessWire uses Bash, PHP while Webiny leverages JSX.
ProcessWire has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Webiny which began 9 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests ProcessWire may have more mature features and established processes.
Webiny is licensed under MIT, while ProcessWire's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Frameworks. However, they also have distinct specializations: ProcessWire also focuses on Traditional & Flat-File CMS while Webiny extends into Headless CMS.
Webiny provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ProcessWire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.