Learn how ProcessWire and Publii differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsRepository
processwire
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 days agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
0.48.3License
GPL-3.0Repository
getpublii/publii
Publii appears to have several advantages over ProcessWire, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Publii significantly outpaces ProcessWire in community adoption with 7,403 stars compared to 1,160 stars on GitHub. This 6.4x difference suggests Publii has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Publii has 474 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Publii is growing faster, adding 63 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 2 stars for ProcessWire (+0.2%). Publii is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ProcessWire last updated 2 days ago and Publii 8 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ProcessWire uses Bash, Typescript, SCSS, PHP while Publii leverages Vue.
ProcessWire has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Publii which began 8 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests ProcessWire may have more mature features and established processes.
Publii is licensed under GPL-3.0, while ProcessWire's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: ProcessWire also focuses on Web Frameworks while Publii extends into Blogging Platforms.