Learn how ProcessWire and Statamic differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsRepository
processwire
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v6.40.0Repository
statamic/cms
Both ProcessWire and Statamic have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Statamic significantly outpaces ProcessWire in community adoption with 4,916 stars compared to 1,160 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Statamic has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Statamic has 653 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ProcessWire is growing faster, adding 5 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against adding 8 stars for Statamic (+0.2%). ProcessWire is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ProcessWire last updated 2 days ago and Statamic 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ProcessWire uses Bash, Typescript, SCSS while Statamic leverages Vue, Laravel.
ProcessWire has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Statamic which began 9 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests ProcessWire may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: ProcessWire also focuses on Web Frameworks.