Learn how ProcessWire and Statamic differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both ProcessWire and Statamic have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Statamic significantly outpaces ProcessWire in community adoption with 4,885 stars compared to 1,149 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests Statamic has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Statamic has 641 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ProcessWire and Statamic are moving at much the same rate, adding 4 stars and adding 22 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with ProcessWire last updated 11 hours ago and Statamic 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ProcessWire uses Bash, Typescript, SCSS while Statamic leverages Vue, Laravel.
ProcessWire has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Statamic which began 9 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests ProcessWire may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: ProcessWire also focuses on Web Frameworks.