Learn how Drupal and Statamic differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Drupal appears to have several advantages over Statamic, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Drupal having 4,292 stars and Statamic having 4,907 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Drupal has 1,982 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Drupal and Statamic are moving at much the same rate, adding 6 stars and adding 15 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.1% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Drupal last updated 2 days ago and Statamic 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Drupal uses Bash while Statamic leverages Vue, Laravel.
Drupal has been in development longer, starting 18 years ago, compared to Statamic which began 9 years ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Drupal may have more mature features and established processes.
Drupal is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Statamic's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS.
Drupal provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Statamic may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.