Learn how Drupal and Statamic differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both Drupal and Statamic have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Drupal having 4,278 stars and Statamic having 4,873 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Drupal has 1,984 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Statamic is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against losing 2 stars for Drupal (0%). Statamic is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Drupal last updated 14 hours ago and Statamic 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Drupal uses Bash while Statamic leverages Vue, Laravel.
Drupal has been in development longer, starting 18 years ago, compared to Statamic which began 9 years ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Drupal may have more mature features and established processes.
Drupal is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Statamic's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS.