Learn how Statamic and Vvveb CMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v6.40.0Repository
statamic/cms
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
1.0.9.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
givanz/vvveb
Vvveb CMS appears to have several advantages over Statamic, particularly in growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Statamic significantly outpaces Vvveb CMS in community adoption with 4,916 stars compared to 1,292 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Statamic has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Statamic has 653 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Vvveb CMS is growing faster, adding 93 stars in the last 30 days (+7.8%) against adding 8 stars for Statamic (+0.2%). Vvveb CMS is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Statamic last updated 2 days ago and Vvveb CMS 11 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Statamic uses JavaScript, CSS, Vue, Laravel while Vvveb CMS leverages Bash.
Both projects started around the same time, with Statamic beginning 9 years ago and Vvveb CMS 8 years ago.
Vvveb CMS is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Statamic's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Vvveb CMS extends into Low-Code/No-Code, Website Builders.
Vvveb CMS provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Statamic may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs