Learn how Statamic and Twill CMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Statamic and Twill CMS have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Statamic having 4,885 stars and Twill CMS having 3,975 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Statamic has 641 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Statamic and Twill CMS are moving at much the same rate, adding 22 stars and adding 10 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Statamic shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Twill CMS was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Statamic is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Vue, PHP, Laravel. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Twill CMS leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Statamic beginning 9 years ago and Twill CMS 8 years ago.
Twill CMS is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Statamic's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS.