Learn how Statamic and Twill CMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Statamic and Twill CMS have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Statamic having 4,907 stars and Twill CMS having 3,974 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Statamic has 649 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Statamic is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+0.3%) against losing 1 stars for Twill CMS (0%). Statamic is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Statamic shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Twill CMS was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Statamic is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP, Vue, Laravel. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Twill CMS leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Statamic beginning 9 years ago and Twill CMS 8 years ago.
Twill CMS is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Statamic's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS.