Learn how Drupal and ProcessWire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Drupal appears to have several advantages over ProcessWire, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Drupal significantly outpaces ProcessWire in community adoption with 4,282 stars compared to 1,149 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Drupal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Drupal has 1,983 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ProcessWire is growing faster, adding 4 stars in the last 30 days (+0.3%) against adding 2 stars for Drupal (0%). ProcessWire is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Drupal last updated 16 hours ago and ProcessWire 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ProcessWire leverages Typescript, SCSS.
Drupal has been in development longer, starting 18 years ago, compared to ProcessWire which began 10 years ago. This 7.8-year head start suggests Drupal may have more mature features and established processes.
Drupal is licensed under GPL-2.0, while ProcessWire's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: ProcessWire extends into Web Frameworks.
Drupal provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ProcessWire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.