Learn how Ghost and Publii differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these blogging platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
v6.72.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
tryghost/ghost
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
0.48.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
getpublii/publii
Ghost appears to have several advantages over Publii, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghost significantly outpaces Publii in community adoption with 55,607 stars compared to 7,362 stars on GitHub. This 7.6x difference suggests Ghost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ghost has 12,022 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Publii is growing faster, adding 43 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 168 stars for Ghost (+0.3%). Publii is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghost last updated 6 hours ago and Publii 3 days ago.
Ghost has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Publii which began 8 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Ghost may have more mature features and established processes.
Ghost uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Publii's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Blogging Platforms, Traditional & Flat-File CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ghost also focuses on Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Ghost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Publii may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.