Learn how Ghost and WordPress differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these traditional & flat-file cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Ghost appears to have several advantages over WordPress, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghost leads in popularity with 54,822 stars vs 21,350 stars for WordPress. The 157% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, WordPress has 12,968 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ghost is growing faster, adding 330 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 75 stars for WordPress (+0.4%). Ghost is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghost last updated 10 hours ago and WordPress 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghost uses Bash, Typescript, JSX while WordPress leverages SCSS, PHP.
WordPress has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Ghost which began 13 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests WordPress may have more mature features and established processes.
Ghost is licensed under MIT, while WordPress's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Traditional & Flat-File CMS, Blogging Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: WordPress extends into Website Builders.
Both Ghost and WordPress offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.