Learn how KeystoneJS and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
9 yearsLicense
MITRepository
keystonejs/keystone
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v6.5.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
webiny/webiny-js
Both KeystoneJS and Webiny have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with KeystoneJS having 9,986 stars and Webiny having 8,049 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, KeystoneJS has 1,260 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
KeystoneJS and Webiny are moving at much the same rate, adding 12 stars and adding 0 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.1% vs 0%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeystoneJS last updated 5 days ago and Webiny 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeystoneJS uses Bash, Next.js, Remix while Webiny leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with KeystoneJS beginning 9 years ago and Webiny 9 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS, Web Frameworks.
Webiny provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while KeystoneJS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.