Learn how KeystoneJS and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both KeystoneJS and Webiny have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with KeystoneJS having 9,958 stars and Webiny having 8,031 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, KeystoneJS has 1,260 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
KeystoneJS and Webiny are moving at much the same rate, adding 36 stars and adding 16 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeystoneJS last updated 2 days ago and Webiny 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeystoneJS uses Bash, Next.js, Remix while Webiny leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with KeystoneJS beginning 8 years ago and Webiny 9 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS, Web Frameworks.
Webiny provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while KeystoneJS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.