Ad
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn More
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn how KeystoneJS and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Both KeystoneJS and Webiny have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with KeystoneJS having 9,933 stars and Webiny having 8,021 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, KeystoneJS has 1,262 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with KeystoneJS last updated 2 days ago and Webiny 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: KeystoneJS uses Bash, Next.js, Remix while Webiny leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with KeystoneJS beginning 8 years ago and Webiny 9 years ago.
KeystoneJS is licensed under MIT, while Webiny's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS, Web Frameworks.
Webiny provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while KeystoneJS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
KeystoneJSvs
DirectusActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository
