Ad
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn More
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn how Builder and KeystoneJS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Both Builder and KeystoneJS have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Builder having 8,792 stars and KeystoneJS having 9,933 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, KeystoneJS has 1,262 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Builder last updated 9 hours ago and KeystoneJS 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Remix. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Builder uses SCSS, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Builder beginning 8 years ago and KeystoneJS 8 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Builder also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Website Builders while KeystoneJS extends into Web Frameworks.
Buildervs
PlasmicActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Repository
