Builder vs Webiny
Learn how Builder and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Learn how Builder and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Builder
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
0.25.9License
MITRepository
builderio/builder
Webiny
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v6.4.8License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
webiny/webiny-js
Detailed Comparison
Webiny appears to have several advantages over Builder, particularly in maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Webiny appears to have several advantages over Builder, particularly in maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both Builder and Webiny show comparable community engagement with 8,803 and 8,031 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Builder has 1,160 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Builder and Webiny are moving at much the same rate, adding 24 stars and adding 16 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Builder last updated 1 day ago and Webiny 9 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Builder uses Bash, Next.js, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Remix.
Project Maturity
Webiny has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Builder which began 8 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Webiny may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Builder also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Website Builders while Webiny extends into Web Frameworks.
Hosting & Deployment
Webiny provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Builder may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.