Ad
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn More
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn how Builder and Ycode differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these website builders is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Both Builder and Ycode have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Builder significantly outpaces Ycode in community adoption with 8,794 stars compared to 268 stars on GitHub. This 32.8x difference suggests Builder has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Builder has 1,159 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ycode is growing faster, adding 62 stars in the last 30 days (+30%) against adding 22 stars for Builder (+0.3%). Ycode is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Builder last updated 2 days ago and Ycode 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Builder uses Bash, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Remix.
Builder has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Ycode which began 6 months ago. This 7.2-year head start suggests Builder may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Website Builders. However, they also have distinct specializations: Builder also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Headless CMS.
Ycode provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Builder may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
