Learn how Directus and Webiny differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Directus appears to have several advantages over Webiny, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Directus significantly outpaces Webiny in community adoption with 37,469 stars compared to 8,031 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Directus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Directus has 4,900 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Directus is growing faster, adding 775 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 16 stars for Webiny (+0.2%). Directus is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Directus last updated 8 hours ago and Webiny 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Directus uses Vue while Webiny leverages JSX.
Directus has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Webiny which began 9 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Directus may have more mature features and established processes.
Webiny is licensed under MIT, while Directus's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Directus also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) while Webiny extends into Web Frameworks.
Both Directus and Webiny offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.