Learn how Directus and Payload differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Directus and Payload have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Directus having 37,821 stars and Payload having 44,636 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Directus has 4,930 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Directus and Payload are moving at much the same rate, adding 546 stars and adding 560 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.5% vs +1.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Directus last updated 21 hours ago and Payload 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Directus uses Vue while Payload leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js, Remix.
Directus has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Payload which began 6 years ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Directus may have more mature features and established processes.
Payload is licensed under MIT, while Directus's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Directus also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Both Directus and Payload offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.