Learn how Craft CMS and Payload differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
5.12.0.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
craftcms/cms
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.93.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
payloadcms/payload
Payload appears to have several advantages over Craft CMS, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Payload significantly outpaces Craft CMS in community adoption with 45,724 stars compared to 3,623 stars on GitHub. This 12.6x difference suggests Payload has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Payload has 4,410 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Payload is growing faster, adding 556 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 12 stars for Craft CMS (+0.3%). Payload is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Craft CMS last updated 14 hours ago and Payload 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Craft CMS uses PHP, Vue, Yii2 while Payload leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js, Remix.
Craft CMS has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Payload which began 6 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Craft CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
Payload is licensed under MIT, while Craft CMS's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Craft CMS and Payload offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.