Learn how Craft CMS and Payload differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Craft CMS and Payload have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Payload significantly outpaces Craft CMS in community adoption with 41,863 stars compared to 3,559 stars on GitHub. This 11.8x difference suggests Payload has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Payload has 3,593 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Craft CMS last updated 13 hours ago and Payload 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Craft CMS uses PHP, Vue, Yii2 while Payload leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js, Remix.
Craft CMS has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Payload which began 5 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Craft CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
Payload is licensed under MIT, while Craft CMS's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Craft CMS and Payload offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.