Learn how Craft CMS and Payload differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Payload appears to have several advantages over Craft CMS, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Payload significantly outpaces Craft CMS in community adoption with 44,267 stars compared to 3,601 stars on GitHub. This 12.3x difference suggests Payload has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Payload has 4,066 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Payload is growing faster, adding 560 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 17 stars for Craft CMS (+0.5%). Payload is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Craft CMS last updated 7 hours ago and Payload 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Craft CMS uses Vue, PHP, Yii2 while Payload leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js, Remix.
Craft CMS has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Payload which began 6 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Craft CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
Payload is licensed under MIT, while Craft CMS's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Craft CMS and Payload offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.