Learn how Craft CMS and KeystoneJS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Craft CMS and KeystoneJS have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
KeystoneJS leads in popularity with 9,859 stars vs 3,559 stars for Craft CMS. The 177% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, KeystoneJS has 1,248 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Craft CMS last updated 15 hours ago and KeystoneJS 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Craft CMS uses SCSS, PHP, Vue, Yii2 while KeystoneJS leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js, Remix.
Craft CMS has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to KeystoneJS which began 8 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Craft CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
KeystoneJS is licensed under MIT, while Craft CMS's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeystoneJS extends into Web Frameworks.
Craft CMS provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while KeystoneJS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.