Learn how Craft CMS and Strapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Strapi appears to have several advantages over Craft CMS, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Strapi significantly outpaces Craft CMS in community adoption with 72,965 stars compared to 3,601 stars on GitHub. This 20.3x difference suggests Strapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Strapi has 9,843 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Craft CMS and Strapi are moving at much the same rate, adding 17 stars and adding 275 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Craft CMS last updated 7 hours ago and Strapi 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Craft CMS uses CSS, SCSS, Vue, PHP, Yii2 while Strapi leverages Bash, JSX.
Strapi has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Craft CMS which began 10 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Strapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Strapi is licensed under MIT, while Craft CMS's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Craft CMS and Strapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.