Learn how Strapi and TinaCMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v5.61.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
strapi/strapi
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
3.15.2License
Apache-2.0Repository
tinacms/tinacms
Strapi appears to have several advantages over TinaCMS, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Strapi significantly outpaces TinaCMS in community adoption with 73,447 stars compared to 13,866 stars on GitHub. This 5.3x difference suggests Strapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Strapi has 10,024 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Strapi and TinaCMS are moving at much the same rate, adding 156 stars and adding 41 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Strapi last updated 5 hours ago and TinaCMS 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TinaCMS leverages CSS, Next.js, Golang.
Strapi has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to TinaCMS which began 7 years ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests Strapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Strapi uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TinaCMS's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Strapi provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while TinaCMS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.