What is the main difference between KeystoneJS and Payload?

KeystoneJS and Payload are both headless cms tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: KeystoneJS or Payload?

The choice between KeystoneJS and Payload depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from KeystoneJS to Payload?

Migration between KeystoneJS and Payload is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn more

KeystoneJS vs Payload

Learn how KeystoneJS and Payload differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.

KeystoneJS

A powerful, customizable content management system and application framework built on Node.js, GraphQL, and React

Visit KeystoneJS Read more

9,986stars+12(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 days ago
Repository age
9 years
License
MIT
Repository
keystonejs/keystone

Payload

A powerful, flexible, and developer-friendly content management system that prioritizes customization and scalability.

Visit Payload Read more

45,724stars+556(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v3.93.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
payloadcms/payload

Detailed Comparison

Payload appears to have several advantages over KeystoneJS, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Payload wins

Community & Popularity

Payload significantly outpaces KeystoneJS in community adoption with 45,724 stars compared to 9,986 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Payload has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Payload has 4,410 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Payload wins

Growth Momentum

Payload is growing faster, adding 556 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 12 stars for KeystoneJS (+0.1%). Payload is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with KeystoneJS last updated 5 days ago and Payload 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Remix. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Payload leverages SCSS.

KeystoneJS wins

Project Maturity

KeystoneJS has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Payload which began 6 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests KeystoneJS may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: KeystoneJS also focuses on Web Frameworks.

Payload wins

Hosting & Deployment

Payload provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while KeystoneJS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.