Ad
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn More
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn how Builder and TinaCMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Both Builder and TinaCMS have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
TinaCMS leads in popularity with 13,684 stars vs 8,792 stars for Builder. The 56% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Builder has 1,155 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Builder last updated 9 hours ago and TinaCMS 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Builder uses SCSS, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Remix while TinaCMS leverages Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Builder beginning 8 years ago and TinaCMS 7 years ago.
Builder uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TinaCMS's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS. However, they also have distinct specializations: Builder also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Website Builders.
Buildervs
PlasmicActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
