Learn how EspoCRM and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Both EspoCRM and Relaticle have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
EspoCRM leads in popularity with 3,231 stars vs 1,511 stars for Relaticle. The 114% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 926 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Relaticle is growing faster, adding 57 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 88 stars for EspoCRM (+2.8%). Relaticle is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 1 day ago and Relaticle 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Relaticle leverages Laravel.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Relaticle which began 2 years ago. This 10.1-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both EspoCRM and Relaticle offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository