Learn how EspoCRM and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both EspoCRM and Relaticle have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
EspoCRM leads in popularity with 3,327 stars vs 1,599 stars for Relaticle. The 108% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 969 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Relaticle is growing faster, adding 112 stars in the last 30 days (+7.5%) against adding 134 stars for EspoCRM (+4.2%). Relaticle is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 14 hours ago and Relaticle 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Relaticle leverages Laravel.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Relaticle which began 2 years ago. This 10.1-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both EspoCRM and Relaticle offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs