Learn how EspoCRM and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
10.0.11License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
espocrm/espocrm
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.8.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
relaticle/relaticle
EspoCRM appears to have several advantages over Relaticle, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
EspoCRM leads in popularity with 3,548 stars vs 1,808 stars for Relaticle. The 96% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 1,019 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
EspoCRM and Relaticle are moving at much the same rate, adding 110 stars and adding 56 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+3.2% vs +3.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 14 hours ago and Relaticle 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Relaticle leverages Laravel.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Relaticle which began 2 years ago. This 10.1-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both EspoCRM and Relaticle offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.