Learn how Erxes and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

EspoCRM appears to have several advantages over Erxes, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Erxes having 4,068 stars and EspoCRM having 3,259 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,305 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
EspoCRM is growing faster, adding 108 stars in the last 30 days (+3.4%) against adding 27 stars for Erxes (+0.7%). EspoCRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 8 hours ago and EspoCRM 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, SCSS, Golang while EspoCRM leverages PHP.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Erxes which began 10 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
EspoCRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Erxes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.