Learn how Erxes and Frappe CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Erxes and Frappe CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Erxes having 4,068 stars and Frappe CRM having 3,354 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe CRM has 1,362 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Frappe CRM is growing faster, adding 364 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 27 stars for Erxes (+0.7%). Frappe CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 8 hours ago and Frappe CRM 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses Next.js, SCSS, Golang while Frappe CRM leverages Vue.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Frappe CRM which began 3 years ago. This 6.8-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
Frappe CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Erxes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs