Learn how CRM and Frappe CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v1.16.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
trycompai/crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.89.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
frappe/crm
Both CRM and Frappe CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM significantly outpaces Frappe CRM in community adoption with 11,733 stars compared to 3,875 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,733 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM and Frappe CRM are moving at much the same rate, adding 787 stars and adding 258 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+7.2% vs +7.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 21 hours ago and Frappe CRM 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Next.js while Frappe CRM leverages Vue.
Frappe CRM has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to CRM which began 3 months ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Frappe CRM may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Frappe CRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and Frappe CRM offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.