Learn how CRM and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

CRM appears to have several advantages over EspoCRM, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM leads in popularity with 9,022 stars vs 3,303 stars for EspoCRM. The 173% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,112 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 1,882 stars in the last 30 days (+26%) against adding 126 stars for EspoCRM (+4%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 7 days ago and EspoCRM 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js while EspoCRM leverages PHP.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to CRM which began 28 days ago. This 12.0-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than EspoCRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and EspoCRM offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.