Learn how CRM and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

CRM appears to have several advantages over EspoCRM, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM significantly outpaces EspoCRM in community adoption with 10,595 stars compared to 3,369 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,469 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 1,945 stars in the last 30 days (+22%) against adding 110 stars for EspoCRM (+3.4%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 7 days ago and EspoCRM 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js while EspoCRM leverages PHP.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to CRM which began 2 months ago. This 12.0-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than EspoCRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and EspoCRM offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.