Ad
Learn more

CRM vs EspoCRM

Learn how CRM and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

vs

CRM

Open source CRM with AI agents that read your inbox, enrich contacts and companies, schedule follow-ups, and build new agents from plain-language descriptions.
11,733stars+787(+7.2%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    21 hours ago
  • Repository age

    3 months
  • Version

    v1.16.0
  • License

    MIT
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    trycompai/crm
Screenshot of CRM

EspoCRM

Open-source CRM software for managing customers, companies, projects and opportunities. Intuitive interface with cloud and self-hosted options available.
3,526stars+102(+3%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of EspoCRM

Detailed Comparison

CRM appears to have several advantages over EspoCRM, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

CRM wins
Community & Popularity

CRM significantly outpaces EspoCRM in community adoption with 11,733 stars compared to 3,526 stars on GitHub. This 3.3x difference suggests CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,733 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

CRM wins
Growth Momentum

CRM is growing faster, adding 787 stars in the last 30 days (+7.2%) against adding 102 stars for EspoCRM (+3%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 21 hours ago and EspoCRM 6 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js while EspoCRM leverages PHP.

EspoCRM wins
Project Maturity

EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to CRM which began 3 months ago. This 12.0-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.

CRM wins
Licensing

CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than EspoCRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both CRM and EspoCRM offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.