Ad
 
Learn More

CRM vs EspoCRM

Learn how CRM and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

vs
Favicon of CRM

CRM

Open source CRM with AI agents that read your inbox, enrich contacts and companies, schedule follow-ups, and build new agents from plain-language descriptions.
9,022stars+1,882(+26%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    7 days ago
  • Repository age


    28 days
  • Version


    v1.15.3
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    trycompai/crm
Screenshot of CRM
Favicon of EspoCRM

EspoCRM

Open-source CRM software for managing customers, companies, projects and opportunities. Intuitive interface with cloud and self-hosted options available.
3,303stars+126(+4%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of EspoCRM

Detailed Comparison

CRM appears to have several advantages over EspoCRM, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

CRM wins
Community & Popularity

CRM leads in popularity with 9,022 stars vs 3,303 stars for EspoCRM. The 173% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,112 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

CRM wins
Growth Momentum

CRM is growing faster, adding 1,882 stars in the last 30 days (+26%) against adding 126 stars for EspoCRM (+4%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 7 days ago and EspoCRM 1 day ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js while EspoCRM leverages PHP.

EspoCRM wins
Project Maturity

EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to CRM which began 28 days ago. This 12.0-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.

CRM wins
Licensing

CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than EspoCRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both CRM and EspoCRM offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.