Learn how CRM and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both CRM and Relaticle have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM significantly outpaces Relaticle in community adoption with 11,332 stars compared to 1,769 stars on GitHub. This 6.4x difference suggests CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,625 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 879 stars in the last 30 days (+8.4%) against adding 93 stars for Relaticle (+5.5%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Relaticle shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while CRM was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Relaticle is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js while Relaticle leverages PHP, Laravel.
Relaticle has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to CRM which began 3 months ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Relaticle may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Relaticle's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and Relaticle offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.