What is the main difference between Atomic CRM and Relaticle?

Atomic CRM and Relaticle are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Atomic CRM or Relaticle?

The choice between Atomic CRM and Relaticle depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Atomic CRM to Relaticle?

Migration between Atomic CRM and Relaticle is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Atomic CRM vs Relaticle

Learn how Atomic CRM and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.

Visit Atomic CRM Read more

1,224stars+38(+3.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.5.0
License
MIT
Repository
marmelab/atomic-crm

Relaticle

Open-source CRM with a built-in AI assistant, 37 MCP tools for external agents, custom fields, role-based permissions, and a REST API. No per-seat pricing.

Visit Relaticle Read more

1,599stars+112(+7.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v3.5.6
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
relaticle/relaticle

Detailed Comparison

Both Atomic CRM and Relaticle have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Atomic CRM having 1,224 stars and Relaticle having 1,599 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Atomic CRM has 786 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Relaticle wins

Growth Momentum

Relaticle is growing faster, adding 112 stars in the last 30 days (+7.5%) against adding 38 stars for Atomic CRM (+3.2%). Relaticle is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 2 days ago and Relaticle 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Atomic CRM uses Typescript, JSX while Relaticle leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Atomic CRM beginning 2 years ago and Relaticle 2 years ago.

Atomic CRM wins

Licensing

Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Relaticle's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

Relaticle wins

Hosting & Deployment

Relaticle provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.