Learn how Atomic CRM and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Both Atomic CRM and Relaticle have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Atomic CRM having 1,198 stars and Relaticle having 1,511 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Atomic CRM has 767 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 54 stars in the last 30 days (+4.7%) against adding 57 stars for Relaticle (+3.9%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 2 days ago and Relaticle 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Atomic CRM uses Typescript, JSX while Relaticle leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Atomic CRM beginning 2 years ago and Relaticle 2 years ago.
Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Relaticle's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Relaticle provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository