Learn how Atomic CRM and Frappe CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Both Atomic CRM and Frappe CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Frappe CRM leads in popularity with 3,033 stars vs 1,174 stars for Atomic CRM. The 158% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe CRM has 1,276 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 6 hours ago and Frappe CRM 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe CRM leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Vue.
Both projects started around the same time, with Atomic CRM beginning 2 years ago and Frappe CRM 3 years ago.
Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Frappe CRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Frappe CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Atomic CRMvs
KrayinActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
