Learn how Atomic CRM and Frappe CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Frappe CRM appears to have several advantages over Atomic CRM, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Frappe CRM leads in popularity with 3,354 stars vs 1,201 stars for Atomic CRM. The 179% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe CRM has 1,362 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Frappe CRM is growing faster, adding 364 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 51 stars for Atomic CRM (+4.4%). Frappe CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 6 days ago and Frappe CRM 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe CRM leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Vue.
Both projects started around the same time, with Atomic CRM beginning 2 years ago and Frappe CRM 3 years ago.
Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Frappe CRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Frappe CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs