Learn how Atomic CRM and Frappe CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.6.1License
MITRepository
marmelab/atomic-crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v16.0.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
frappe/crm
Both Atomic CRM and Frappe CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Frappe CRM leads in popularity with 3,930 stars vs 1,437 stars for Atomic CRM. The 173% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe CRM has 1,585 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 87 stars in the last 30 days (+6.4%) against adding 168 stars for Frappe CRM (+4.5%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 1 day ago and Frappe CRM 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe CRM leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Vue.
Both projects started around the same time, with Atomic CRM beginning 2 years ago and Frappe CRM 3 years ago.
Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Frappe CRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Frappe CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs