Learn how Frappe CRM and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.88.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
frappe/crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.10.18.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
macro-inc/macro
Both Frappe CRM and Macro CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Frappe CRM having 3,828 stars and Macro CRM having 4,778 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe CRM has 1,536 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 414 stars in the last 30 days (+9.5%) against adding 268 stars for Frappe CRM (+7.5%). Macro CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe CRM last updated 15 hours ago and Macro CRM 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe CRM uses Vue while Macro CRM leverages Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.
Frappe CRM has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 1 year ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Frappe CRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Frappe CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs