Learn how Frappe CRM and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Frappe CRM and Macro CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Frappe CRM having 3,665 stars and Macro CRM having 4,497 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe CRM has 1,482 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 357 stars in the last 30 days (+8.6%) against adding 225 stars for Frappe CRM (+6.5%). Macro CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe CRM last updated 6 hours ago and Macro CRM 1 hour ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe CRM uses Vue while Macro CRM leverages Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.
Frappe CRM has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 11 months ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Frappe CRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Frappe CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs