Learn how Macro CRM and Twenty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Twenty appears to have several advantages over Macro CRM, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Twenty significantly outpaces Macro CRM in community adoption with 53,981 stars compared to 692 stars on GitHub. This 78.0x difference suggests Twenty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Twenty has 8,284 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Macro CRM last updated 10 hours ago and Twenty 16 hours ago.
Twenty has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 9 months ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Twenty may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Twenty provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository