What is the main difference between Macro CRM and Twenty?

Macro CRM and Twenty are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Macro CRM or Twenty?

The choice between Macro CRM and Twenty depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Macro CRM to Twenty?

Migration between Macro CRM and Twenty is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Macro CRM vs Twenty

Learn how Macro CRM and Twenty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Macro CRM

Automatically creates and enriches contacts, companies, and deal threads from your team's email. No data entry, no imports, no admin overhead.

Visit Macro CRM Read more

3,884stars+3,200(+468%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
v2026.8.20.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Twenty

Self-hostable CRM built for technical teams who need a fully customizable, extensible platform without vendor lock-in or proprietary tooling.

Visit Twenty Read more

55,225stars+1,779(+3.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v2.30.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
twentyhq/twenty

Detailed Comparison

Twenty appears to have several advantages over Macro CRM, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Twenty wins

Community & Popularity

Twenty significantly outpaces Macro CRM in community adoption with 55,225 stars compared to 3,884 stars on GitHub. This 14.2x difference suggests Twenty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Twenty has 8,615 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Macro CRM wins

Growth Momentum

Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 3,200 stars in the last 30 days (+468%) against adding 1,779 stars for Twenty (+3.3%). Macro CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Macro CRM last updated 12 hours ago and Twenty 12 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro CRM uses Python, C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri while Twenty leverages Next.js, NestJS.

Twenty wins

Project Maturity

Twenty has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 10 months ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Twenty may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

Twenty wins

Hosting & Deployment

Twenty provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.